Campaign to review EBacc achieves national coverage in first 24 hours
16 August 2011
Music Teacher magazine (MT) and the Incorporated Society of Musicians (ISM)'s campaign to introduce a sixth pillar of creative subjects in the English Baccalaureate, launched yesterday, has achieved nationwide press coverage in its first 24 hours.
The Independent was first to report the campaign, with the Guardian following shortly afterwards. Guardian journalist Jessica Shepherd wrote:
'Musicians have launched a national campaign to persuade ministers of the importance of studying music at school.
'The coalition government announced in December that schools would be measured according to how many pupils achieved at least a C at GCSE in English, maths, two sciences, history or geography and a modern or ancient language.
'Musicians are furious that the new measurement – known as the English Baccalaureate (Ebacc) – excludes music and other creative subjects, such as art and drama.'
The BBC news website was next to report the story. Like the Independent and the Guardian, it quoted an official response from the DfE:
'The EBacc is there to make sure that every single child gets a chance to study the core academic subjects which top universities demand. But the EBacc is not the be all and end all.
'The White Paper made clear that this is "only one measure of performance and should not be the limit of schools' ambitions for their pupils".
'We've protected £82.5m funding for music services this year and are reforming the system so money is targeted where it is needed most in the future.'
Full details of the campaign, including a link to a template letter you can write to your MP, are here:
ISM and Music Teacher magazine call for EBacc revision
15 August 2011
The Incorporated Society of Musicians (ISM) and Music Teacher magazine are calling for the government to review the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) with the aim of including music in a sixth pillar of creative and cultural academic subjects.
Everyone can help campaign to get music included in the E-Bacc by writing a letter to their MP telling her or him of their concerns. The ISM has created a template for what people might like to say, which can be downloaded from www.ism.org/news/article/ebacc_revision.
The EBacc ranks schools on the proportion of pupils who get an A* to C grade in five pillars of subject options: maths, English, a language, a science and a humanities subject. But the respected (and higher level) International Baccalaureate (IB) has six pillars of subjects for pupils to pick from, including a creative and cultural option.
Deborah Annetts, chief executive of the ISM, said: ‘We want to see music included in the English Baccalaureate as part of a sixth pillar of creative and cultural subject choices. Not only is music challenging and enriching as a subject in schools, but to forget music at GCSE level is to forget the creative, social, academic, economic, emotional and intellectual benefits of an excellent music education; this is to say nothing of its own unique musical value.’
Christopher Walters, editor of Music Teacher magazine, said: ‘Essentially a performance measure, the EBacc will inevitably have negative consequences for any subjects that are excluded from it. Music Teacher is therefore delighted to be part of a campaign not only to include music but to introduce an entire sixth pillar of creative subjects, which we believe would greatly improve the impact of the E-Bacc in our schools.’
The influential Education Select Committee, a cross-party committee of MPs, published a report last week calling on the government to revise its current arrangements and ‘think again’. The committee also called the decision to omit music ‘odd’ and could not see a ‘rationale’ behind this decision.
Deborah Annetts welcomed the report and said: ‘The Select Committee report was clear: the government must revise its decisions around what constitutes an English Baccalaureate. At the same time, they must be open and transparent in accepting that the current proposal does not constitute a ‘Baccalaureate’ but rather a league table or performance ranking.
‘The government has said it is prepared to listen and that is why we are asking musicians to write to their MP to ask them to support the review of the E-Bacc with the aim of including music in an additional subject option.’
Education Select Committee criticises music's exclusion from EBacc
28 July 2011
Following a recent inquiry, parliament's Education Select Committee has recommended a review of the English Baccalaureate (EBacc), stating that it was 'not clear on the rationale behind the exclusion' of some subjects and questioning the seemingly 'odd' decision to exclude music from its remit.
The committee’s report includes the following key recommendations and comments:
'The Department for Education’s decision not to include music and art in the English Baccalaureate could be seen as odd in light of the government’s view that "Involvement with the arts has a dramatic and lasting effect on young people" but perhaps even more so considering Michael Gove’s own words when announcing the English Baccalaureate last year: "I'm proposing that the government look at how many young people in each secondary school secure five good GCSEs including... a humanity like history or geography, art or music."
'[The committee] therefore recommends a review of the complement of subjects in the English Baccalaureate, following the completion of the national curriculum review, which should seek input not only from teachers, parents and pupils, but also from higher and further education institutions, employers, and learned societies.
'[The committee does] not believe the English Baccalaureate — the hybrid of a certificate and a performance measure, named after a qualification — is appropriately labelled: it is not a baccalaureate, and as it stands the name can therefore be misleading to parents, professionals and pupils.'
The committee also criticised the lack of consultation prior to the English Baccalaureate’s introduction and warned that 'In future, the government should aim to give appropriate notice of, and undertake consultation with key stakeholders and the wider public on, any new performance or curriculum measures.'
The Education Select Committee's concerns will be seen by many within music education as a sign that campaigns to include music on the EBacc could still be successful, despite a final 'no' from education secretary Michael Gove last week. Deborah Annetts, chief executive of the Incorporated Society of Musicians, which has been instrumental in the campaign for music's inclusion, said:
'Darren Henley was unequivocal in his recommendation that music be included in both the English Baccalaureate and the national curriculum. We look forward to the government giving further thought to its current policy in light of this inquiry.
'Music education in the UK sets the standard for the rest of the world and, as well as developing children's musical understanding, has been shown to improve attainment in key areas such as literacy, numeracy and social skills. At the same time, the government must also not forget that the music education in our schools feeds right through into our creative and cultural economy.'
Royal Philharmonic Society awards nearly £70,000 to young musicians
26 July 2011
The Royal Philharmonic Society (RPS) has awarded nearly £70,000 through grants and bursaries in order to support young musicians and composers. This year, 18 young music students will receive awards totalling £21,000 towards the purchase of new instruments, and three outstanding young musicians, receiving a total of £35,000 from the RPS Julius Isserlis Scholarship, will be supported in study overseas. Three young composers will each receive £3,000 commissions to write new works for the Philharmonia’s Music of Today series, and a fourth will write a new work for 2012 Cheltenham Festival.
John Gilhooly, chairman of the RPS said: ‘The RPS is taking a lead in supporting young musicians, but it is important that we all recognise that investment in young talent is key to the future of music. While pleased to be able to support some of our most talented young musicians and composers, we are very aware that the need far outstrips resources.’
Official: music to be excluded from EBacc
21 July 2011
The Department for Education (DfE) has published a 'Statement of Intent - 2011', which, among other things, confirms that there will be no place for music on the new English Baccalaureate (EBacc).
The statement reads: 'Last year’s publication of the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) prompted much interest and debate about the range of subjects which it should encompass. After consideration of representations, and to provide schools with certainty, the Secretary of State is minded to leave the subjects unchanged i.e. English, maths, two sciences, history or geography, and an ancient or modern foreign language.
'However, from this year, AS levels taken in the relevant subject before the end of KS4 will now also count towards the EBacc. A detailed list of the GCSEs that count towards the EBacc will be published at www.education.gov.uk/performancetables.
'From this year, we will now show more information about each of the EBacc subject areas. The Performance Tables will show the number of pupils entered for each subject area – English, maths, science, languages and humanities. For each of English and maths, we will publish the percentage of the cohort who have attained grade A*-C (as we would expect every pupil to have been entered for these GCSEs); and for other subject areas, the percentage of those entered who have attained grade A*-C.'
The music education community, in particular the Incorporated Society of Musicians, has been vocal in urging the government to include music on the EBacc. Campaigners have claimed that music will decline in schools as a result of its exclusion from the EBacc list, suggesting it will have less prominence on the league tables and therefore will become a lower priority for investment.
The news that music is definitely to be excluded from the EBacc will fuel fears that it will also lose its place on the national curriculum at Key Stage 3 when the outcome of the current curriculum review is announced.
The full statement can be read here:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148